Myntra Designs Private Limited has been found guilty by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) for violating foreign direct investment (FDI) regulations. According to regulatory filings, Myntra received over ₹1,654 crore in FDI, with the explicit condition that these funds were to be used solely for business-to-business (B2B) operations. However, authorities discovered that Myntra diverted these funds for other business activities, contrary to FDI policy.
ED Notice
Details of the Allegations
- Business Model Claim:
Myntra positioned itself as a “wholesale cash & carry” business to qualify for FDI and benefit from government schemes designed for B2B operations. - Actual Practice:
Investigations revealed that most of Myntra’s inventory was sold to Vector E-Commerce Pvt. Ltd.—a company established in 2010 and headquartered in Bengaluru—which is a related entity and also the largest contributor to Myntra’s revenue. Vector E-Commerce then sold these goods directly to consumers, effectively conducting B2C operations. - Regulatory Bypass:
The ED and regulators concluded that this structure was purposefully adopted to circumvent FDI restrictions on multi-brand B2C retail in India.
Enforcement Action
The Enforcement Directorate has filed an official complaint against Myntra, its group companies, and directors under the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA). The ongoing investigation may result in the recovery of misused funds, monetary penalties, or further legal proceedings.
Why This Matters
- Policy Implications:
The Indian government closely monitors the use of foreign capital by domestic firms. Circumventing FDI regulations can lead to market share loss for local brands to multinational corporations, undermining domestic interests and policy goals. - Missed Compliance Benefits:
Myntra stood to gain various tax benefits and operational support if the FDI had been used as intended for B2B activities.
What’s Next?
Authorities may impose fines, reclaim funds used in violation of FDI norms, or initiate additional proceedings depending on the investigation’s findings. This case is likely to set a precedent, influencing compliance strategies of other e-commerce companies receiving FDI and reinforcing the importance of adhering to government regulations.
 for violating foreign direct investment (FDI) .){kind=link}